5.5.06

 

La Marca en el corazon


eltiempo.com / política

Mayo 5 de 2006
Presidente Uribe reconoció que sugirió a E.U. usar la tecnología para el control de inmigrantes

En entrevista con Citytv, dijo que sí ha hablado del tema con congresistas de ese país, pero con la intención de humanizar las leyes migratorias.

El presidente se pronunció ayer sobre la versión de congresistas norteamericanos que le atribuyeron la idea de instalar chips en los cuerpos de los colombianos que deseen trabajar temporalmente en Estados Unidos, como una manera de evitar que se queden indefinidamente en ese país.

Sobre la idea de implantar los microchips, expresó:

“Les he dicho (a E.U.): si Estados Unidos con ese desarrollo de tecnología, con los computadores, con los chips no tiene mecanismos para saber que una persona que entró a desarrollar un trabajo de estación se quedó en el país o regresó a Colombia, entonces en qué estamos”. Cuando se le preguntó si eso significaba un sí a la propuesta de los microchips, dijo: “no tengo nada más que agregar”.

El episodio del microchip aparece en las memorias que el congresista Alen Specter, presidente del Comité Judicial del Congreso de E.U., dejó consignadas tras una visita a Colombia y uno de cuyos aparte dice: “El Presidente (Uribe) dijo que consideraría implantar microchips en los cuerpos de los trabajadores colombainos antes de ingresar a Estados Unidos”.

Artículo completo en El Tiempo en línea

Del Foro de los lectores

CARLOS
E-mail: cvarela7@earthlink.net
Ciudad: Houston, Texas, 04/05/2006 11:05 PM
Sr. Uribe, no se que pensar, marcar las personas con microchips?, basicamente es lo mismo que marcar el ganado con hierro, sr. Uribe, estaria Ud. dispuesto a dejarse marcar?, o su familia?, creo que ahi si la embarro, pero no es la unica, ahora ultimo como que lo viene haciendo con mas frecuencia, que le esta pasando?,
un ex-Uribista....

Ivan
E-mail: ivan@mymail.com
Ciudad: NY, 04/05/2006 11:05 PM
Que manera de "humanizar"... implantando chips. Que novedoso concepto de "humanizar".

jORGE gAITAN
E-mail: jorgegaitan1948@yahoo.es
Ciudad: Bucaramanga, 04/05/2006 10:38 PM
POR QUÈ NO SE MARCA UD. PRIMERO, SR. URIBIO ? O ES QUE NOS VIÒ CARA DE VACAS ? LO QUE LE FALTABA A ESTE ENANO, QUE LOS COLOMBIANOS TERMINEMOS CON EL RABO MARCADO COMO LO TIENEN LAS MULAS DE SUS HACIENDAS EN CÒRDOBA Y ANTIÒQUIA. ESTA ES LA TAPA.QUÈ MAS QUERRÀ LA EMINENCIA ?

Jose Morales
E-mail: jomo@hotmail.com
Ciudad: Madrid, 05/05/2006 12:30 AM
Hay esta pintado el farsante que hemos elegido, porque a los gringos le compra armamento para seguir con mas muertes en el Pais, en lugar de comprar microchips para incorporar a los paras, guerrilleros traquetos y hampones que andan con tanta maldad sueltos en el Pais, que verguenza que usted nos represente y peor verguenza que nosotros lo hayamos elegido. "Como duele mi COLOMBIA"


4.5.06

 

TLC - Theory of the Leisure Class

TLC - Antropología de un lavado imperial

In the book, Veblen argues that economic life is not driven by notions of utility, but by social vestiges from pre-historic times. Drawing examples from his time (turn-of-the-century America) and anthropology, he held that much of today's society is a variation on early tribal life.

According to Veblen, beginning with primitive tribes, people began to adopt a division of labor along certain lines. The "higher-status" group monopolized war and hunting while farming and cooking were considered inferior work.

He argued this was due to barbarism and conquest of some tribes over others. Once conquerors took control, they relegated the more menial and labor-intensive jobs to the subjugated people, while retaining the more warlike and violent work for themselves. It didn't matter that these "menial" jobs did more to support society than the "higher" ones.

To Veblen, society never grew out of this stage; it simply adapted into different forms and expressions. For example, he noted that during the Middle Ages, only the nobility was allowed to hunt and fight wars. Likewise, in modern times, he noted that manual laborers usually make less money than white-collar workers.

"...Aggression becomes the accredited form of action, and booty serves as prima facie evidence
of successful aggression. As accepted at this cultural stage, the accredited,
worthy form of self-assertion is contest; and useful articles or services
obtained by seizure or compulsion, serve as a conventional evidence of
successful contest. Therefore, by contrast, the obtaining of goods by other
methods than seizure comes to be accounted unworthy of man in his best estate.
The performance of productive work, or employment in personal service, falls
under the same odium for the same reason. An invidious distinction in this way
arises between exploit and acquisition on the other hand. Labour acquires a
character of irksomeness by virtue of the indignity imputed to it..."

"...Epithets and titles used in addressing chieftains, and in the propitiation of kings and gods, very
commonly impute a propensity for overbearing violence and an irresistible
devastating force to the person who is to be propitiated. This holds true to an
extent also in the more civilised communities of the present day. The
predilection shown in heraldic devices for the more rapacious beasts and birds
of prey goes to enforce the same view.

Under this common-sense barbarian appreciation of worth or honour, the taking of
life - the killing of formidable competitors, whether brute or human - is
honourable in the highest degree. And this high office of slaughter, as an
expression of the slayer's prepotence, casts a glamour of worth over every act
of slaughter and over all the tools and accessories of the act. Arms are
honourable, and the use of them, even in seeking the life of the meanest
creatures of the fields, becomes a honorific employment. At the same time,
employment in industry becomes correspondingly odious, and, in the common-sense
apprehension, the handling of the tools and implements of industry falls beneath
the dignity of able-bodied men. Labour becomes irksome...."
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of the Leisure Class.
An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions.
(1899, viii, 400 p.) Descargue el texto completo en formato .txt

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?